jthomas
03-12 06:44 PM
It was closed by the administrator but it had 3 pages of opinions in it. Should be worthwhile looking back for it.
wallpaper Kelly Rowland Finally Unveils
cooolvick
08-14 03:23 PM
Thanks for the reply.
Is it ok to recapture the old priority date which was in EB3 category in current I140 (EB2 category)?
Will it affect the I140 approval anyways?
Vikram
Is it ok to recapture the old priority date which was in EB3 category in current I140 (EB2 category)?
Will it affect the I140 approval anyways?
Vikram
optimystic
10-19 10:20 PM
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC
And its official now.. USCIS have consolidated on one more conniving trend to continue to keep us in the dark :mad:
The dates are claimed to be "as of " Aug 31st.
When they did this in the last update and said the dates were "as of " July 31 2008, I thought it was going to be a one time thing and in the next update they will give us up to the date info. But hell NO!!
If they only disclose info as of some date in the past, how the hell are we supposed to know whether our case is currently "beyond" normal processing times !!! And how the heck can we file a service request !
They just want us off their back altogether and go at their own pace.
With this staggered (Processing dates and PD) approach, they can manipulate one thing or the other (Spike the PD and retrogress the Proc Date OR vice Versa) and forever juggle and skirt around accountability altogether and don't have to answer or take any status queries at all ! Why don't they use the same intelligence to try to improve their processes and improve their productivity !
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=TSC
And its official now.. USCIS have consolidated on one more conniving trend to continue to keep us in the dark :mad:
The dates are claimed to be "as of " Aug 31st.
When they did this in the last update and said the dates were "as of " July 31 2008, I thought it was going to be a one time thing and in the next update they will give us up to the date info. But hell NO!!
If they only disclose info as of some date in the past, how the hell are we supposed to know whether our case is currently "beyond" normal processing times !!! And how the heck can we file a service request !
They just want us off their back altogether and go at their own pace.
With this staggered (Processing dates and PD) approach, they can manipulate one thing or the other (Spike the PD and retrogress the Proc Date OR vice Versa) and forever juggle and skirt around accountability altogether and don't have to answer or take any status queries at all ! Why don't they use the same intelligence to try to improve their processes and improve their productivity !
2011 kelly rowland album cover.
waitin_toolong
02-05 12:01 PM
the fact that you move using AC21 and use EAD for work nullifies your H1 immediately and the dependents lose H4. even the date on I-94 becomes meaningless.
you will have to renew your EAD for work and AP for travel.
The fact that your I-485 is pending is all that is needed to keep you legal. But if for any reason I-485 is denied you will be out-of-status.
you will have to renew your EAD for work and AP for travel.
The fact that your I-485 is pending is all that is needed to keep you legal. But if for any reason I-485 is denied you will be out-of-status.
more...
mzdial
June 13th, 2004, 01:29 AM
And all you thought I did was shoot Dphoto members!
Most of these were shot using the new 75-300 DO that Bob let me test out. (Thanks again Bob!) I'm impressed with the lens. I may be adding it to the arsenal as a good travel lens.
Anyways, here are my pics of our gracious model Julie:
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/showgallery.php/cat/723
It was great meeting all of you that traveled to Indy in such a short, spontaneous get together.
-- Matt
Most of these were shot using the new 75-300 DO that Bob let me test out. (Thanks again Bob!) I'm impressed with the lens. I may be adding it to the arsenal as a good travel lens.
Anyways, here are my pics of our gracious model Julie:
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/showgallery.php/cat/723
It was great meeting all of you that traveled to Indy in such a short, spontaneous get together.
-- Matt
kishorek111
01-02 01:16 PM
I filed my 485 in Aug 2007 (in the July fiasco), but filed my EAD in Jan 2008. So do I need to send the application fee.
more...
GCVictim
05-08 05:55 AM
Friends,
I have question for you. How many APs we have to show at POE? One of my friends, he came from Canada, at POE they took 2 APs. They stamped on both of them. One they took and one they gave back to him with stamp.
As of I know. We need to give 1 AP at POE. Is this true?
I have question for you. How many APs we have to show at POE? One of my friends, he came from Canada, at POE they took 2 APs. They stamped on both of them. One they took and one they gave back to him with stamp.
As of I know. We need to give 1 AP at POE. Is this true?
2010 Seems Kelly Rowland is ready
gcpadmavyuh
01-27 01:13 AM
No documents needed. They can visit you anytime during the 10 yr validity of the visa. The only condition is that they have to leave the country before the date on I-94 expires.
Dear All Immivoices,
My parents have 10 years multiple visa. It was issue in year 2007. They have visited USA
before two years. If they want to come again, is there any document I need to send them?
Thanks in advance to all of you.
Dear All Immivoices,
My parents have 10 years multiple visa. It was issue in year 2007. They have visited USA
before two years. If they want to come again, is there any document I need to send them?
Thanks in advance to all of you.
more...
kumar26fl
09-01 06:45 PM
Hi,
In anticipation of birth certificate RFE, i have BC affidavits (from parents and relatives) and NAC ready to submit it will be requested. However, my priority date is not current and god knows, when it will be current.....My question is: Is there a validity period for these BC affidavits and NAC documents? It is almost one year since these documents are made ready and I was wondering if these documents lose their validity one year after the signed date on them?
Please suggest
Thanks
In anticipation of birth certificate RFE, i have BC affidavits (from parents and relatives) and NAC ready to submit it will be requested. However, my priority date is not current and god knows, when it will be current.....My question is: Is there a validity period for these BC affidavits and NAC documents? It is almost one year since these documents are made ready and I was wondering if these documents lose their validity one year after the signed date on them?
Please suggest
Thanks
hair Kelly Rowland whose real name
teikyo30
08-05 06:29 PM
I read the letter myself when it came yesterday. It clearly stated there is no appeal due to the fact that she applied to early.
more...
greenguru
03-01 11:09 AM
LCA(H1B) is for the Company and not for the Employee.
If you check your LCA your name will not be there anywhere.
It just gives
1.Location
2.Wage
3.Date.
I think you should be fine..
If you check your LCA your name will not be there anywhere.
It just gives
1.Location
2.Wage
3.Date.
I think you should be fine..
hot Kelly Rowland#39;s #39;Here I Am#39;
va_dude
02-09 02:36 PM
well if there's a way for you to get your approved labor certification doc, or even the copy of the filed labor application; then definitely get it.
The labor app has the exact job description too. So if you do use portability (ac-21) it'll help to match it with the job specs of the new position.
good luck.
The labor app has the exact job description too. So if you do use portability (ac-21) it'll help to match it with the job specs of the new position.
good luck.
more...
house album by Kelly Rowland .
sreeanne
11-16 06:22 PM
Guys,
My wife was working on H1B now and she got EAD last week. Out of the following options which is TRUE and which is BETTER.
Option 1--> Moving to EAD from H1B by signing on I-9
Option 2--> COS from H1 to H4 and then to EAD.
I read in some of our threads that if we choose option 1 and if something goes wrong in AOS, we have to file for new H1B again. We have to wait for quota etc etc.
I also read that if we choose Option 2, if something goes wrong in EAD, we can always change back [ie RESUME]to H1B.
I am not so sure about these. Could some one share their thought.
Thanks
sree
My wife was working on H1B now and she got EAD last week. Out of the following options which is TRUE and which is BETTER.
Option 1--> Moving to EAD from H1B by signing on I-9
Option 2--> COS from H1 to H4 and then to EAD.
I read in some of our threads that if we choose option 1 and if something goes wrong in AOS, we have to file for new H1B again. We have to wait for quota etc etc.
I also read that if we choose Option 2, if something goes wrong in EAD, we can always change back [ie RESUME]to H1B.
I am not so sure about these. Could some one share their thought.
Thanks
sree
tattoo Kelly Rowland has been working
zoozee
10-09 09:02 PM
Hello,
We just received the ASC notice for biometric notice. The date they provided is the same date where we have an appointment in Mexico US Consulate.
Any experience for re-scheduling the biometric appointment. We would like the appointment to be earlier.
Regards
zoozee
We just received the ASC notice for biometric notice. The date they provided is the same date where we have an appointment in Mexico US Consulate.
Any experience for re-scheduling the biometric appointment. We would like the appointment to be earlier.
Regards
zoozee
more...
pictures Kelly Rowland has finally
iptel
10-17 01:39 AM
Which center NSC TSC ?
dresses kelly rowland motivation
alparsons
November 8th, 2004, 10:11 PM
Hi,
I don't have direct personal experience with those particular lenses, however as a general rule suplementary lenses can be designed to give sharper results if they are designed to go in front of a particular lens. (the Nikon suplementary wide angle is probably slightly sharper) If it were me I would try the lenses I already have to see if the results I got from either or both were adequate for my personal purposes before I shelled out more bucks to change them. Even if they are terribly unsharp you may find that the exact look of the unsharpness is apealing in your images.
as far as a UV filter goes it is usualy a very subtle difference in the look of the images, unless you have a habit of destroying the front element of your lenses. If that were the case it could save you the cost of replaceing scratched lenses. Personaly I just make it a habit to keep my fingers off of the front of the glass, and so far in the last 30 or so years I haven't needed to keep a UV or skylight filter on my lenses.
I don't have direct personal experience with those particular lenses, however as a general rule suplementary lenses can be designed to give sharper results if they are designed to go in front of a particular lens. (the Nikon suplementary wide angle is probably slightly sharper) If it were me I would try the lenses I already have to see if the results I got from either or both were adequate for my personal purposes before I shelled out more bucks to change them. Even if they are terribly unsharp you may find that the exact look of the unsharpness is apealing in your images.
as far as a UV filter goes it is usualy a very subtle difference in the look of the images, unless you have a habit of destroying the front element of your lenses. If that were the case it could save you the cost of replaceing scratched lenses. Personaly I just make it a habit to keep my fingers off of the front of the glass, and so far in the last 30 or so years I haven't needed to keep a UV or skylight filter on my lenses.